Lab-grown meat is produced by culturing animal cells and could serve as an alternative to traditional livestock farming. Proponents argue that it can reduce environmental impact and animal suffering, and improve food security. Opponents argue that it may face public resistance and unknown long-term health effects.
Response rates from 721 Terenure voters.
25% Yes |
75% No |
18% Yes |
67% No |
7% Yes, as long as a disclosure is prominently displayed on packaging and restaurant menus |
8% No, we need more long-term studies to ensure safety |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 721 Terenure voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 721 Terenure voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Terenure voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZRBX2X7mos7MO
If lab-grown meat is to be commercialised, chattle farmers need to be subsidised in order to convert to arable farming.
@MG---Sw 2mos2MO
Yes, but only when safety can be ensured. The government should also promote meat-free diets or low-meat diets for health and environment reasons.
@9ZW5DMK7mos7MO
Investment into natural unprocessed food to make it more accessible to lower income families is far more important.
@9MLXW341yr1Y
Yes, as long as the sector is regulated as with the food and agriculture industries.
@9ZF5GD58mos8MO
If there are no health concerns with the specific meat products added to the market, I see no issue with it.
@9YLLZZK8mos8MO
We're not there yet, but thought also has to be given to what this will do to already existing industries.
@9S5TD2211mos11MO
No, and should be encouraging the creation and refinement of plant-based alternatives
@9NWX4CX1yr1Y
Only in the case where there is a massive food shortage to an extent everyone is a ak risk from dying from starvation in the near future.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
